A collective mistake rather than a class of villains. http://amzn.to/2iuS4FV
Book: Who owns the future
Know more
A collective mistake, not a class of villains
In Who Owns the Future?, Jaron Lanier describes the problems of the digital economy as a collective mistake rather than a class of villains. It is tempting to blame specific people or companies. Yet many problems emerge from systems that thousands of people built, used and accepted.
This perspective changes how we approach solutions. If villains cause a problem, removing them should fix it. However, if the problem is systemic, replacing people changes little. The incentives, structures and habits remain.
Fixing a collective mistake together
Systems thinking helps here. Donella Meadows described leverage points, places where small changes can shift a whole system. Changing incentives, information flows or rules often works better than blaming individuals.
For example, if platforms profit from outrage, then outrage will spread regardless of who runs them. Changing the business model would address the root cause more effectively than criticising executives alone.
Organisations face similar dynamics. A failed project often reflects unclear goals, poor communication or unrealistic deadlines rather than one person’s error. Therefore, blameless post-mortems focus on processes, not culprits.
This view also encourages personal responsibility without guilt. Each of us contributes in small ways, through what we use, share and accept. Moreover, small changes by many people can shift outcomes.
Of course, accountability still matters when individuals act unethically. Systemic thinking does not excuse wrongdoing.
In the end, Lanier’s framing invites cooperation. Shared mistakes need shared solutions, and recognising that is the first step toward fixing them.
In addition, collective problems often need collective action. Joining communities, supporting good policies or simply discussing issues with others multiplies impact. Therefore, individual choices matter, yet they work best when connected. As a result, shared efforts can correct shared mistakes much faster than isolated attempts ever could.
